MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8: A phase III trial of marizomib in combination with temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy versus temozolomide-based radiochemotherapy alone in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

2021· article· en· W2947234519 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Roth, Thierry Gorlia, Jaap C. Reijneveld, Filip De Vos, Ahmed Idbaïh, Jean‐Sébastien Frenel, Émilie Le Rhun, Jose M. Sánchez, James Perry, Laura Masucci, Pierre Frères, Hal W. Hirte, Clemens Seidel, Anna Maria Elisabeth Walenkamp, F. Dhermain, Martin J. van den Bent, Christopher J. O’Callaghan, Maureen Vanlancker, Warren Mason, Michael Weller

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity Health NetworkQueen's UniversityMcMaster UniversityHôpital Notre-DameHealth Sciences CentreJuravinski Cancer CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTemozolomideMedicineInternal medicineOncologyDacarbazineConcomitantInterim analysisRadiation therapyChemotherapyPhases of clinical researchProgression-free survivalRandomized controlled trialClinical trialGliomaChemoradiotherapyChemotherapy regimenQuality of life (healthcare)SurgeryCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2004 Background: Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma receive postoperative standard therapy with radiotherapy (RT), and concomitant and up to six cycles of maintenance temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy (TMZ/RT→TMZ). Marizomib is a novel, irreversible and brain-penetrant pan-proteasome inhibitor with encouraging findings in preclinical models and early-stage clinical trials for patients with newly diagnosed and recurrent glioblastoma. Therefore, a phase 3 trial was designed to explore the activity of marizomib in addition to TMZ/RT→TMZ. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03345095 Methods: EORTC 1709/CCTG CE.8 is a multicenter, randomized, controlled, open label phase 3 superiority trial. Eligibility criteria included histologically confirmed newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 70. Eligible patients were stratified for institution, age, KPS as well as extent of surgery, and centrally randomized in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving marizomib in addition to standard treatment with patients receiving standard treatment only. Secondary endpoints include progression-free survival (PFS), safety, neurocognitive function, and quality of life. Results: The study was opened at 49 EORTC sites in Europe, 23 CCTG sites in Canada, and 8 sites in the US. Patient enrolment started in June 2018 and was close to completion at the time of a planned interim analysis in September 2020. A total of 749 patients (of the planned 750) were randomized when the IDMC recommended to discontinue enrollment. Age, KPS and extent of resection were well balanced between the 2 study arms. No difference in median OS was observed between the standard arm (15.9 months) and the marizomib arm (15.7 months; HR = 0.99). Median PFS was 6.1 vs. 6.2 months (HR = 1.02). Patients in the marizomib group had more often grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) compared to the standard therapy group (42.6% vs. 20.5%), including ataxia, hallucinations and headache. Conclusions: The addition of marizomib to standard radiochemotherapy did not improve OS or PFS in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Final survival analyses including determination of MGMT promoter methylation status and analyses of other secondary endpoints are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03345095.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.024

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.342 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicGlioma Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→