MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Emergency department (ED) visits and hospitalizations in survivors of childhood cancer in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

2019· article· en· W2947290708 on OpenAlexaff
Valérie Arsenault, Weiyu Qiu, Qi Liu, Jennifer M. Yeh, Wendy M. Leisenring, Kirsten K. Ness, Gregory T. Armstrong, Tara O. Henderson, Alexandra Walsh, K. Robin Yabroff, Kevin C. Oeffinger, Melissa M. Hudson, Yutaka Yasui, Paul C. Nathan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeEmergency departmentRelative riskPediatricsPoisson regressionConfidence intervalCancerChildhood cancerUnderweightCancer registryRate ratioInternal medicinePopulationBody mass indexOverweightPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10056 Background: Chronic health conditions are frequent among childhood cancer survivors and lead to increased health care resource utilization. We compared rates of ED visits and hospitalizations between survivors and siblings. Methods: Analyses included 10,762 ≥5-year survivors and 2,069 siblings who completed a questionnaire from 2014-2016. We calculated ED visits and non-obstetric hospitalizations in the last 12 months per 1,000 person-years (PY) and evaluated cause-specific hospitalization rates using ICD-10 categories. Multivariable Poisson regression models evaluated predictors of survivor visits. Results: Median age in survivors and siblings was 35.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 29.0-43.1) and 42.9 years (IQR 35.6-50.2), respectively; time from cancer diagnosis was 27.8 years (IQR 21.7-34.1). 24.2% of survivors and 16.2% of siblings had ≥1 ED visit (p < 0.001); rates were 521/1,000 PY for survivors and 246/1,000 PY for siblings (age/sex-adjusted relative rate [RR] 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 - 2.3). Factors associated with increased survivor ED visits were black race (RR 1.6, CI 1.2-2.0), being obese (RR 1.4, CI 1.2-1.7) or underweight (RR 1.9, CI 1.2-3.0), female sex (RR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.5), younger age (p = 0.02) or abdomen/pelvis (RR 1.2, CI 1.1-1.4) or brain irradiation (RR 1.2, CI 1.0-1.4). 13.3% of survivors and 8.3% of siblings had ≥1 hospitalization (p < 0.001); rates were 219/1,000 PY for survivors and 130/1,000 PY for siblings (RR 1.9; CI 1.3 - 2.9). Factors associated with increased survivor hospitalizations were female sex (RR 1.3, 1.1-1.5), younger age (p < 0.0001), being obese (RR 1.3, CI 1.0-1.6) or underweight (RR 1.5, 95% CI 1.1-2.2) or platinum chemotherapy exposure (RR 1.6, CI 1.3-2.0). The most common indications for hospitalization were diseases of the digestive (21.9/1,000 PY; CI 18.7 - 25.7) and circulatory (20.9/1,000 PY; CI 17.8 – 24.4) systems. Leukemia survivors had the highest ED visit and hospitalization rates. Conclusions: Childhood cancer survivors had a 2-fold increased likelihood of an ED visit or hospitalization compared with their siblings. This increases the economic burden on survivors and the health care system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.447
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→