Extraction of molecular features for the drug discovery targeting protein‐protein interaction of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> CagA and tumor suppressor protein ASSP2
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Half of the world population is infected by the Gram-negative bacterium Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). It colonizes in the stomach and is associated with severe gastric pathologies including gastric cancer and peptic ulceration. The most virulent factor of H. pylori is the cytotoxin-associated gene A (CagA) that is injected into the host cell. CagA interacts with several host proteins and alters their function, thereby causing several diseases. The most well-known target of CagA is the tumor suppressor protein ASPP2. The subdomain I at the N-terminus of CagA interacts with the proline-rich motif of ASPP2. Here, in this study, we carried out alanine scanning mutagenesis and an extensive molecular dynamics simulation summing up to 3.8 μs to find out hot spot residues and discovered some new protein-protein interaction (PPI)-modulating molecules. Our findings are in line with previous biochemical studies and further suggested new residues that are crucial for binding. The alanine scanning showed that mutation of Y207 and T211 residues to alanine decreased the binding affinity. Likewise, dynamics simulation and molecular mechanics with generalized Born surface area (MMGBSA) analysis also showed the importance of these two residues at the interface. A four-feature pharmacophore model was developed based on these two residues, and top 10 molecules were filtered from ZINC, NCI, and ChEMBL databases. The good binding affinity of the CHEMBL17319 and CHEMBL1183979 molecules shows the reliability of our adopted protocol for binding hot spot residues. We believe that our study provides a new insight for using CagA as the therapeutic target for gastric cancer treatment and provides a platform for a future experimental study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".