Molecular Modelling of Potential Candidates for the Treatment of Depression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A lot of research initiatives in the last decades have been focused on the search of new strategies to treat depression. However, despite the availability of various antidepressants, current treatment is still far from ideal. Unwanted side effects, modest response rates and the slow onset of action are the main shortcomings. As a strategy to improve symptomatic relief and response rates, the dual modulation of the serotonin transporter and the histamine H3 receptor by a single chemical entity has been proposed in the literature. Accordingly, this work aims to elucidate key structural features responsible for the dual inhibitory activity of the hexahydro‐pyrrolo‐isoquinoline derivatives. For this purpose, two approaches were employed, four‐dimensional quantitative structure‐activity relationship (4D‐QSAR) and molecular docking. The 4D‐QSAR models for both receptors allowed the identification of the pharmacophore groups critical for the modelled biological activity, whereas the binding mode of this class of compounds to the human serotonin transporter was assessed by molecular docking. The findings can be applicable to design new antidepressants.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".