Abstract 20100: Parental Presence at Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Bedside Transfer Rounds Reduces Parental Anxiety: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: The transfer of children from the pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU) to the ward is a time of great anxiety for the parents of children and medical vulnerability for children who are receiving complex therapies. Hypothesis: We assessed the hypothesis that parental presence at bedside transfer rounds would reduce parental anxiety and improve patient safety following transfer of children from PCICU to the ward. Methods: We undertook a randomized controlled trial of children discharged from the PCICU to the ward. Consenting parents were randomized to be absent (control group) or present (intervention group) at multidisciplinary face to face bedside transfer rounds. The primary outcome measure was parental stress measured by the validated Spielberger’s State -Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) pre and post transfer. Secondary outcome measures included unplanned readmission to the PCICU, medication errors and emergency calls to the ward. We excluded patients being transferred between intensive care units. Results: We enrolled 230 subjects (control group n=93, intervention group n=91, failed to complete study n= 46). The 2 groups were matched with respect to gender (male 46% control vs 54% intervention), age (median age control 1.9 yrs (range 0.02 to 16.3) vs intervention 0.9 (0.02 to 17), parental age 32 yrs (18-64) vs 33 (20-60), parental years of schooling 15.5 years ( 7-26) vs 15 (9-24), presence of medical co-morbidities (33% each group). There was significantly greater reduction in trait (p=0.004, state (p=0.01) and total anxiety (p=0.0012) pre and post transfer in the intervention group vs the control group. There were no differences in minor medication errors (36 vs 33), unplanned PCICU re-admissions (11 vs 12) and emergency ward calls(7 vs 8) Conclusions: Parental presence at face to face multidisciplinary transfer rounds from the PCICU is associated with reduced parental anxiety without change in medication errors, readmission rates or emergency calls to the ward. Reduced parental anxiety may improve parental satisfaction with their child’s care.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".