MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of asparaginase discontinuation on outcome in childhood ALL: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group (COG).

2019· article· en· W2947481805 on OpenAlexaff
Sumit Gupta, Cindy Wang, Elizabeth A. Raetz, Reuven J. Schore, Wanda L. Salzer, Eric Larsen, Kelly W. Maloney, Leonard A. Mattano, William L. Carroll, Naomi Winick, Stephen P. Hunger, Mignon L. Loh, Meenakshi Devidas

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDiscontinuationHazard ratioInternal medicineCumulative incidenceConfidence intervalAsparaginaseContext (archaeology)CogRandomizationIncidence (geometry)Clinical trialPediatricsLymphoblastic LeukemiaLeukemiaCohort

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

10005 Background: Asparaginase (ASP) is an important component of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) treatment, but is often discontinued due to toxicity. For allergic reactions, but not other toxicities, Erwinia Asparaginase (EA) is often substituted. The majority of treatment protocols use discrete, discontinuous periods of asparagine depletion. In the context of such protocols, the impact of EA substitution or complete ASP discontinuation is unknown. Methods: Patients age 1-30.99 years enrolled on frontline COG trials for B-ALL [standard risk (NCI SR): AALL0331; high risk (NCI HR) AALL0232] were included. The number of prescribed pegaspargase (PEG) doses varied by trial, risk strata, and randomization (Table). Maintenance therapy did not contain ASP. Landmark analyses starting at Maintenance compared event free survival (EFS) between those receiving all prescribed doses of PEG vs. those switched to EA but receiving all doses vs. those not receiving all ASP doses. Results: This study included 5,195 AALL0331 and 3,001 AALL0232 patients. The cumulative incidence of PEG discontinuation was 12.2±4.6% on AALL0331 and 25.4%±0.8% on AALL0232. In multivariable analyses adjusted for patient and disease variables, NCI HR patients who did not receive all prescribed ASP doses had inferior EFS [hazard ratio (HR) 1.5, 95% confidence interval (95CI) 1.2-1.9; p=0.002] compared to those receiving all prescribed PEG doses. Patients with EA substitution who completed their courses were not at increased risk (HR 1.1, 95CI 0.7-1.6; p=0.69). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients discontinuing ASP due to pancreatitis or thrombosis yielded similar results. NCI SR patients who discontinued ASP were not at elevated risk (HR 1.2, 95CI 0.9-1.6; p=0.23), except when analyses were restricted to NCI SR patients with slow early response (HR 1.7, 95CI 1.1-2.7; p=0.03). Conclusions: Discontinuation of ASP doses is associated with significantly inferior EFS and must be balanced against the risks of ASP re-challenge. Our results also illustrate the potentially severe consequences of EA shortages. Prescribed pegasparagase doses. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.096
GPT teacher head0.499
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAcute Lymphoblastic Leukemia researchFrench-language works237,207