MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947493659 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.036

37 Choice of maintenance intravenous fluids: A survey of Canadian paediatric residents

2019· article· en· W2947493659 on OpenAlexaffabout
Laura M. Kinlin, Andrew Helmers, Jeremy Friedman, Carolyn E Beck

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicElectrolyte and hormonal disorders
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSick childMedicineFamily medicinePediatricsMedical education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

While hypotonic fluids were the standard of care for maintenance intravenous (IV) therapy in paediatrics for many years, evidence suggests an association with hyponatremia, an iatrogenic complication that can result in morbidity and mortality. Recent literature and guidelines support use of isotonic solutions for infants and children in most clinical contexts, as there is likely non-physiologic secretion of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) in hospitalized patients. Current IV fluid prescribing practices in Canada are unknown. It is unclear whether clinical practice reflects guidelines and emerging literature related to the risk of hyponatremia with hypotonic IV fluids. Furthermore, choice of maintenance IV fluids for neonates and the routine addition of potassium to maintenance fluids - topics not addressed in existing guidelines - have never been studied. We sought to explore Canadian paediatric residents’ choice of maintenance IV fluids, particularly with reference to fluid tonicity in a variety of age groups (including neonates). Secondary objectives were to determine (1) what dextrose concentration residents would prescribe for neonates/young infants, and (2) whether residents routinely add potassium chloride to maintenance fluids. A link to an ethics board-approved, internet-based survey was emailed to trainees in the 17 paediatric residency programs across Canada, via the Canadian Paediatric Program Directors, in the spring of 2018. Data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools. The survey instrument, available in both English and French, included questions related to demographic and training information, followed by a series of questions eliciting IV fluid choice in a variety of clinical scenarios (hyperbilirubinemia, bronchiolitis, seizures, appendicitis, viral gastroenteritis, and respiratory distress) and patient ages (7 days, 6 weeks, 5 months and 12 years). As an exploratory question, participants were asked whether they routinely add potassium chloride to maintenance IV fluids when a child is nil per os (NPO), has a serum potassium within normal limits and normal urine output. Percentages were used to summarize categorical data. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test, as appropriate. Survey responses were submitted by 147 residents (22% response rate). Tonicity: Isotonic IV fluids were selected by >75% in all clinical scenarios involving infants and children assuming normal electrolytes at baseline (Figure). Very hypotonic solutions (0.2% NaCl and ‘2/3-1/3’) were rarely chosen. In scenarios describing hypernatremia – a 12-year-old and a 5-month-old with gastroenteritis – approximately half of participants continued to opt for isotonic fluids (56.5% and 46.9%, respectively). In neonates, the majority of participants chose to use hypotonic solutions, but a substantial proportion opted for isotonic fluids (Figure); senior residents were more likely than junior residents to select hypotonic fluids (p=0.002 for bronchiolitis and p=0.003 for hyperbilirubinemia). Dextrose: In clinical scenarios involving 6-week-old infants, the vast majority of participants opted to include a dextrose concentration of 5% in maintenance IV fluids (>85%). In scenarios describing 7-day-old neonates, the majority selected 10% dextrose, although approximately one third continued to select 5% dextrose. Potassium: The majority of participants (62.6%) routinely add 20 mmol/L of potassium chloride to maintenance IV fluids when a child is NPO while 33.1% do not typically include potassium chloride. Residents who selected “other” (5.4%) and provided an explanation of their potassium prescribing practice identified duration of NPO and underlying disease process as being important in their decision-making. Results suggest a predominance of isotonic and 5% dextrose fluid use, even when a hypotonic solution might be appropriate (i.e., hypernatremia). There was more variability (1) amongst neonates and (2) in terms of routine addition of potassium chloride; these findings likely reflect a relative paucity of guidance and gaps in existing guidelines. Trainees should be encouraged to select IV fluids thoughtfully based on existing guidelines (when applicable) and careful consideration of physiologic factors affecting fluid and electrolyte status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designObservational
DomainMethods
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicElectrolyte and hormonal disordersFrench-language works237,207