Kepentingan Kanada Melakukan Hubungan Perdagangan Bebas Dengan Korea Selatan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This research that the study of the International of economic political analyzes about the interest of Canada to do trading free trade relationship with South Korea. The purpose of this reasearch is to describe in general of the bilateral relations of Canada and South Korea in trading activities, explaining of the Canada interests to do free trade agreement with South Korea and also describe of cooperation does Canada and South Korea in the frame of the CKFTA's Agreement.This research used qualitative methods which is done by explanning the case based on existing facts. The techniques used to collects data to study the case to library research in the form of journals, books, an official document, articles, and websites. The theoretical framework applied in this research are liberalism perspective, International cooperation theory, and nation-state analysis. the International cooperation is a form of relations made by a country with another country, which has the purpose to sufficent the needs of life and the existence of a country in International social order, in addition to the creation of peace and prosperity of life that be desire of every human being and country in the world.The bilateral relations of Canada and South Korea have been well established for a long time, both in the political, economic and cultural fields. In addition, Canada and South Korea are both developed countries, located in different continents. Then, to further strengthen the relationship, these two countries to enter into free trade agreements contained within the framework of the CKFTA agreement. This CKFTA agreement framework represents the interests of both countries of economic, political and cultural. It's same with Canada who expects to benefit from the implementation of CKFTA agreement by through a reduction to eliminate tariffs policy and increase market access within the Asia Pacific region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".