MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947502330 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz038

Provincial dissemination of HEARTSMAP, an emergency department psychosocial assessment and disposition decision tool for children and youth

2019· article· en· W2947502330 on OpenAlexafffund
Erica Koopmans, Tyler Black, Amanda S. Newton, Gurm Dhugga, Naveen Karduri, Quynh Doan

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
FundersMinistry of Health, British ColumbiaDoctors of BC
KeywordsPsychosocialGeneral partnershipDispositionMental healthEmergency departmentMedicineSession (web analytics)NursingMedical educationPsychologyPsychiatryBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: This article describes the provincial dissemination of HEARTSMAP, an evidence-based emergency department (ED) psychosocial assessment and disposition decision tool for clinician use with children and youth. METHODS: HEARTSMAP was disseminated in partnership with local, child and youth mental health teams, as part of a quality improvement initiative implemented in British Columbia EDs. The target audience of education sessions were clinicians working in ED settings responsible for paediatric psychosocial assessments. We used the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance of HEARTSMAP dissemination, analyzing data from session evaluation forms and online tool data. RESULTS: Education sessions reached 475 attendees, in 52 of 95 British Columbia EDs. HEARTSMAP training was well received by clinicians with 96% describing effective content including increased comfort in conducting paediatric psychosocial assessments and confidence in disposition planning after training. Clinicians identified unclear processes and lack of local resources as the main barriers to implementation. One-third of the attendees expressed willingness to use the tool, and 27% of registered clinicians have used the tool postimplementation. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach reached and effectively trained clinicians from over half of the province's EDs to use HEARTSMAP for emergency paediatric psychosocial assessments. For some, this provided greater comfort and confidence for these assessments and the following disposition decisions. This evaluation provides valuable insights on training clinicians to use a paediatric mental health tool within diverse ED settings and emphasized the need for ongoing support and institutional engagement to facilitate local, infrastructural, and operational processes for adoption and maintenance, postdissemination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.064
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.575
Threshold uncertainty score0.855

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.064
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207