PP2A <sup>Cdc55</sup> dephosphorylates Pds1 to inhibit spindle elongation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract DNA replication stress stalls replication forks leading to chromosome breakage and Intra-S checkpoint activation. In S. cerevisiae , this checkpoint arrests the cell cycle by stabilizing securin (Pds1) and inhibiting the cyclin dependent kinase (CDK) through multiple pathways. Pds1 inhibits separase (Esp1) which cleaves the cohesin subunit Scc1 and also functions in spindle elongation. However, the role of Pds1-Esp1 in spindle elongation during replication stress response is unknown. Here, we show that Pds1 phosphorylation plays a positive role in spindle elongation through the Pds1-Esp1 interaction in unperturbed and replication stress conditions. PP2A Cdc55 directly dephosphorylates Pds1 both in vivo and in vitro . Pds1 hyperphosphorylation in a cdc55Δ mutant enhanced the Pds1-Esp1 interaction, which accelerated spindle elongation. This PP2A Cdc55 -dependent Pds1 dephosphorylation plays a role during replication stress and acts independently of the known Mec1, Swe1 or Spindle Assembly Checkpoint (SAC) checkpoint pathways. We propose a model where PP2A Cdc55 dephosphorylates Pds1 to disrupt the Pds1-Esp1 interaction that inhibits spindle elongation during replication stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".