MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of treatment on patient-reported pain and fatigue in early breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy.

2019· article· en· W2947532401 on OpenAlexaffabout
Bo Wan, William Pidduck, Liying Zhang, Caitlin Yee, Katie Wang, Selina Chow, Stephanie Chan, Leah Drost, Hany Soliman, Eric Leung, Philomena Sousa, Donna Lewis, Carlo DeAngelis, Prince Taylor, Edward Chow

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicManagement of metastatic bone disease
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBreast cancerInternal medicineUnivariate analysisQuality of life (healthcare)Radiation therapyChemotherapyStage (stratigraphy)CancerOncologyMultivariate analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e12019 Background: Patients who receive radiotherapy (RT) for breast cancer often report pain and fatigue which contribute negatively to quality of life (QoL). We aim to identify demographic, treatment, and disease characteristics associated with pain and fatigue using the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS). Methods: We identified all patients diagnosed with non-metastatic breast cancer from 2011 Jan-2017 Jun at the Odette Cancer Centre with at least one ESAS completed pre- and post-RT. Data on systemic treatment, RT, demographics, and disease stage were extracted. To identify factors associated with pain and fatigue pre- and post-RT and their changes, univariate and multivariable linear regression analysis was conducted. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: This study included 1222 female patients (mean age 59 years old) who completed ESAS on average 28- and 142-days pre-RT (baseline) and post-RT respectively. In multivariable analysis, higher baseline pain scores associated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and eventual receipt of locoregional (p = 0.026) or chest wall RT (p = 0.003), whereas higher baseline fatigue scores associated with higher disease stages (p = 0.001) and locoregional RT (p < 0.001). Post-RT symptom severity correlated only with locoregional RT (higher pain scores, p < 0.001). Reductions in pain was associated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.002) and chest wall RT (p = 0.031). Reduction in fatigue was associated with adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.011) and locoregional RT (p = 0.007) although both had higher pre-RT scores in univariate analysis. Conclusions: Patients at higher disease stages or who received chemotherapy or chest wall RT tended to experience more severe short-term morbidity. However, patients who received locoregional RT tended to have greater pain that persisted after RT completion compared to those who did not.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.375 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicManagement of metastatic bone diseaseFrench-language works237,207