Membangun Komitmen Kerja Dalam Mengatasi Gap Antara Budaya Organisasi Dan Kinerja Pegawai Di Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi Papua
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaruh budaya organisasi terhadap kinerja pegawai Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi Papua dimana komitmen kerja sebagai variable mediasinya. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah pegawai Dinas Perhubungan Provinsi Papua dengan sampel sebanyak 150 pegawai secara random sampling sementara data yang dikumpulkan menggunakan kuisioner yang kemudian dianalisis dengan Structural Equation Model (SEM) dengan bantuan program Analisis Moment of Structural (AMOS) versi 22 berdasarkan kriteria Goodness Of Fit. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa budaya organisasi berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja dengan nilai koefisien sebesar 0,581, budaya organisasi berpengarug positif dan signifikan terhadap komitmen kerja dengan nilai koefisien sebesar 0,639, komitmen kerja pegawai berpengaruh positif dan signifikan terhadap kinerja pegawai dengan nilai koefisien sebesar 0,284 serta dari hasi sobel test diperoleh nilai sobel test sebesar 2,0042 dengan nilai signifikansi 0,010. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel komitmen kerja berperan secara signifikan sebagai variabel mediasi antara budaya organisasi dan kinerja pegawai. Kata Kunci : Budaya organisasi, komitmen kerja, kinerja, AMOS
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".