MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947657727 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.093

94 Maternal Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) and child development at 5 years

2019· article· en· W2947657727 on OpenAlexaffabout
Erin Hetherington, Sheila McDonal, Suzanne Tough

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicFamily and Disability Support Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdverse Childhood ExperiencesMental healthPsychological resilienceOddsOptimismPsychologySocial supportMedicineNeuroticismClinical psychologyChild developmentLogistic regressionDevelopmental psychologyPersonalityPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) can have an impact on the health and well-being of individuals throughout life. Adults with a history of ACEs who become parents may experience parenting difficulties and face challenges in building supportive environments which can influence child development. To examine the impact of maternal adversity on child development at five years, and what factors may promote resiliency among children at high risk. Participants include 1992 mothers and children participating in a community-based longitudinal cohort in an urban setting in Canada. Mothers completed questionnaires regarding their own ACEs, mental health, parenting and personality and child outcomes. Child externalizing and internalizing behaviour was measured using the Behavioural Assessment Scale for Children -2 (BASC-2). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to estimate risk and protective factors for internalizing and externalizing behaviour among children at 5 years. A resilience analysis among children whose mothers had four or more ACEs was carried out examining the effect of potential protective factors including maternal optimism, social support, and use of community supports and childcare controlling for known risk factors. Sixteen percent of children scored at risk for internalizing behaviours. Maternal ACES were not associated with internalizing behaviours, however, risk factors included persistent maternal mental health symptoms (OR 1.80 95% CI 1.18, 2.74), maternal neuroticism (OR 2.23 95% CI 1.56, 3.18) and hostile parenting practices (OR 1.51 95% CI 1.08, 2.23). Children of women who worked or were students had reduced odds of internalizing behaviours (OR 0.73 95% CI 0.55, 0.98). Eleven percent of children scored at risk for externalizing behaviours. Maternal ACEs were associated with a 2.30 increased odds of externalizing behaviours (95% CI 1.50, 3.51). Additional risk factors included persistent maternal mental health symptoms, and hostile parenting practices. Male children were also at an increased risk of externalizing problems (OR 2.58 95% CI 1.76, 3.77). Among children with mothers who had high ACEs, high levels of social support was protective against internalizing behaviours, but not externalizing behaviours. While maternal ACEs may impact certain aspects of child development, maternal psychosocial health has the potential to be a less stigmatizing indicator of risk. Strategies to support parents through targeting modifiable factors, and supporting mental health wellbeing can help optimize child development in the next generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicFamily and Disability Support ResearchFrench-language works237,207