Docetaxel dose-intensity effect on overall survival in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e16501 Background: Several studies assessed the association of docetaxel dose intensity (DI) and efficacy in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with contradicting conclusions. In this retrospective analysis we will assess whether the docetaxel DI used in patients with metastatic castrate-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) is associated with overall survival (OS). Methods: We have identified all the patients with mCSPC treated at The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre that received docetaxel chemotherapy between June 2014 - September 2017. For each patient we calculated the relative dose intensity (RDI) and assessed whether it’s associated with OS using univariate and multivariate cox-proportional hazards analysis. Results: Eighty-0ne patients were included in the analysis. Nineteen patients (23.5%) had their body surface area capped at 2 which resulted with de facto median dose reduction of 7% (IQR 6% - 9%). Ten patients had upfront dose reduction (usually due to significant co-morbidities) with a median dose reduction of 20% (IQR 19.25 – 20.75). Only 35 patients (43.2%) were able to complete the planned treatment with a RDI of at least 90%. After a median follow-up of 29.4 months, 32 patients (39.5%) died. The median OS was 43.9 months. On a univariate analysis RDI and number of cycles of docetaxel received were found to be statistically significant associated with OS. For every 10% decrease in RDI the risk of death increased by 23% (HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09 – 1.4, P = 0.0011). For every incremental cycle (up to a total of 6) the risk of death decreased by 27% (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.61- 0.88, P = 0.001). On multivariate analysis we included age, Gleason score, burden of disease, visceral involvement and baseline PSA. Reduced RDI remained the only significant variable associated with OS (HR 1.2, 95% CI 1.04 – 1.39, P = 0.0117). Conclusions: Reduced docetaxel DI administrated to mCSPC patients is associated with worse survival. Therefore unnecessary docetaxel dose reductions, treatments delays and early discontinuation should be avoided. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor should be considered in order help maintain standard DI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".