MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Unselected germline screening in pancreatic adenocarcinoma yields high rates of pathogenic and likely pathogenic variants (PV) in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes.

2019· article· en· W2947710003 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carol Cremin, Michael Lee, Quan Hong, Carolyn Hoeschen, Steve E. Kalloger, Joanna M. Karasinska, Anna Mackenzie, Mary McCullum, Jennifer Nuk, James T. Topham, Sophie Sun, David F. Schaeffer, Daniel J. Renouf, Kasmintan A. Schrader

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalPancreas Centre (Canada)BC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCHEK2CancerGenetic testingCDKN2APopulationOncologyGermlineInternal medicineLynch syndromeGermline mutationFamily historyPancreatic cancerKRASColorectal cancerMutationGeneticsGeneDNA mismatch repairBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1582 Background: Recent literature cites a germline mutation rate of 3.9-15.1% in patients diagnosed with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) depending on breadth of genes tested, pre-selection of high-risk history and population substructure. True incidence of germline mutations in PDAC is unknown in unselected population. Methods: All patients (pts) diagnosed with PDAC in the province of British Columbia, Canada and referred to the Hereditary Cancer Program, were eligible to undergo 30 gene Color saliva kit testing under a research protocol, or clinical multigene testing if they met existing local criteria regardless of whether they signed on to the protocol. Any healthcare provider or patients themselves could refer. Results: 243 pts were referred between August 2016 and October 2018 but 25.1% (61) declined and 9.1% (22) died before testing. Of the 141 pts who consented to research protocol and completed germline testing, median age was 64 (46.1-81.0), 68.8% were European, 1.4% Ashkenazi Jewish heritage, 42% male, 61% non-smoker, 24.1% had personal history of a second cancer and 39% had metastatic disease. Baseline characteristics were similar between the PV positive and uninformative group. 20/25 PV were in known PDAC susceptibility genes with cascade screening implications (ATM (9), BRCA2 (4), BRCA2/ATM (1), CDKN2A (4), and MSH2 (2)). Excluding the 3 PV identified through carrier testing (1) and prior research identification (2), the rate of PV in unselected, unrelated PDAC cohort is 22/138 (15.9%). Utilizing previous NCCN criteria for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing or for familial pancreatic cancer did not appear to select for patients with higher risk of PV positive (12/65 (18.4%) PV positive rate versus 13/76 (17.1%) in those that didn’t meet criteria). Previous criteria would have missed 52% (13/25) PV in ATM (6), BRCA2/ATM (1), BRCA2 (2), MSH2 (2), NBN (1), CHEK2 (1). To date, a third of families with PV identified have accessed cascade testing in 38 relatives. Conclusions: Given the high incidence of 15.9% PV in hereditary cancer susceptibility genes, our data support recommendations for universal germline genetic testing of PDAC pts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.321 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→