Polyelectrolyte vs Polyampholyte Behavior of Composite Chitosan/Gelatin Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Composite films of proteins and polysaccharides have a broad range of biomedical and food packaging applications, in which they are frequently exposed to fluid environments with varying ionic strengths. In the present work, we report the behavior of biopolymer films derived from chitosan (Ch), gelatin (GEL), and Ch/GEL mixture in salt solutions with varying concentrations and ion charges. The swelling and dissolution of the Ch films reduced with increasing salt concentration due to the polyelectrolyte behavior of this biopolymer, while the GEL films displayed a polyampholyte behavior, in which film swelling and dissolution were enhanced in salt solutions. Composite Ch/GEL films followed the behavior of GEL. The release of small ionic and zwitter-ionic molecules from the films was enhanced in ionic solutions due to the screened attraction between these molecules and the polymer matrix. These results provide insight into the behavior of protein/polysaccharide films in varying ionic environments, thus enabling enhanced design of biomaterials for a broad range of applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".