MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical outcomes of EGFR+ NSCLC pts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).

2019· article· en· W2947719708 on OpenAlexaff
Zofia Piotrowska, Rosemary Cobb, Mandeep K. Banwait, Nicolas Marcoux, Meghan J. Mooradian, Ibiayi Dagogo‐Jack, Rebecca S. Heist, Alice T. Shaw, Justin F. Gainor, Lecia V. Sequist

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLung Cancer Research Studies
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePemetrexedNivolumabPembrolizumabIpilimumabErlotinibInternal medicineOncologyCarboplatinAtezolizumabLung cancerCancerChemotherapyImmunotherapyEpidermal growth factor receptorCisplatin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

9069 Background: ICIs have limited efficacy in EGFR+ NSCLC with ORR ~10% if PDL1 > 25% in ATLANTIC, yet ICIs are often used in later lines of therapy as pts and providers feel there may be little risk. The impacts of ICI in this setting are poorly understood. We describe our institutional experience of ICI use in EGFR+ NSCLC. Methods: MGH pts with advanced EGFR+ NSCLC treated with ICI (any line) were retrospectively reviewed for demographics, PDL1, treatment duration and patient outcomes. Disease flare was defined as hospital/hospice admission due to progression or death (Chaft CCR 2011) within 30d of ICI. Results: 40 pts with EGFR+ NSCLC (22 del19, 11 L858R, 5 ins20, 2 other) received ICI between 7/2012-12/2018. 13 were on a clinical trial. 4 had SCLC transformation. Median # of prior therapies = 3 (range, 0-8). Of 16 with PDL1 quantified, 8 had PDL1 > 25%. ICI regimens were: nivolumab (nivo; n = 16), pembrolizumab (pembro; 9), atezolizumab (atezo; 3), ipilimumab/nivo (7), carboplatin/pemetrexed (pem)/pembro (3), pem/pembro (1), paclitaxel/atezo (1). 18 pts stopped TKI ≤21d prior to ICI start. Median duration of treatment (DOT) was 25 days (range, 1-1482). DOT was > 1 yr for 2 pts (5%), treated with 1st-line nivo/erlotinib (erlo) and 3rd-line nivo. All 8 pts with PDL1 > 25% had DOT < 2 mos. Disease flare within 30d of ICI occurred in 16/40 (40%) overall, 8/18 (44%) who stopped TKI ≤21d of ICI start, and 14/26 (54%) who received ICI in 4thline or later. 8 pts had concurrent TKIs (4 erlo/nivo, 2 erlo/pembro, 1 erlo/atezo, 1 osimertinib (osi)/nivo); 3/8 discontinued ICI for toxicity (all 3 treated first-line). 5 pts received osi immediately post-ICI. There was no pneumonitis on osi post-ICI; 1 pt developed gr3 LFTs and gr4 hypoNa. Conclusions: In this real world cohort of EGFR+ NSCLC, clinical benefit from ICI (assessed by DOT) was rare, including pts with high PDL1. 5% had durable benefit (both pts received ICI in earlier lines of therapy). A previously underappreciated negative outcome of ICI is that admission to hospital, hospice or death within 30d of ICI occur in up to 54% pts. This may be related to disease flare or hyperprogression and suggests that use of ICI in heavily pretreated EGFR+ NSCLC may negatively impact outcomes at end-of-life and should be used with caution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.519
Teacher spread0.396 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicLung Cancer Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207