MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Comprehensive transcriptome analysis reveals link between epigenetic dysregulation, endogenous retrovirus expression and immunogenicity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

2019· article· en· W2947721471 on OpenAlexaff
Shehara Mendis, James T. Topham, Emma Titmuss, Laura M. Williamson, Erin Pleasance, Luka Culibrk, Joanna M. Karasinska, Shiru Lucy Liu, Michael Lee, John Aird, Richard A. Moore, Andrew J. Mungall, Janessa Laskin, Steven J.M. Jones, Marco A. Marra, David F. Schaeffer, Daniel J. Renouf, Jonathan M. Loree

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation
Canadian institutionsVancouver General HospitalVancouver Coastal HealthCanada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences CentrePancreas Centre (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndogenous retrovirusColorectal cancerBiologyCancer researchEpigeneticsTranscriptomeGene expressionCancerMedicineGeneGeneticsGenome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3535 Background: Endogenous retrovirus (ERV) elements represent genomic footprints of ancestral retroviral infections within the human genome. Previous studies have demonstrated increases in ERV mRNA as a result of DNA hypomethylation, and ERV transcription has been associated with increased immunogenicity in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. We performed comprehensive bioinformatics analysis of ERV transcription in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC), to identify novel links between ERV transcription, epigenetic dysregulation and immunogenicity in metastatic colorectal carcinoma (mCRC). Methods: Tumour samples from 63 patients with mCRC were subjected to RNA sequencing as part of the Personalized OncoGenomics program (POG; NCT02155621) at BC Cancer. Patients were enrolled between 07/2012-07/2017. ERV transcription was quantified across 702,533 distinct loci. Tumors were classified ERV-hi if their total ERV expression (RPKM) was greater than the mean across all samples. High antiviral gene expression tumors (AVG-hi) were designated as having a mean expression of IFIH1, DDX58, TLR3, TANK, TBKBP1, TBK1, IRF3 and IRF7 that was greater than the mean across all samples. All pairwise comparisons of gene expression were subjected to multiple hypothesis correction. Results: Median age was 59 years, with 34 (54%) male and 1 tumor microsatellite unstable. ERV-hi tumors showed increased expression of DNA demethylators TET2 ( q=0.0045) and TET3 ( q<0.0001). Significant overlap existed between ERV-hi and AVG-hi tumors (18/27, p=0.016). Tumors both ERV-hi and AVG-hi trended towards increased PD-L1 expression (p=0.055) and showed a significant increase in survival compared to tumors with high antiviral expression in the absence of high ERV transcription (p=0.0043). Conclusions: Our results suggest DNA demethylation drives increased ERV transcription and ERV-associated immunogenicity in mCRC. Moreover, we provide novel insight into the impact of ERV transcription on the biology of mCRC, highlighting ERV transcription as a potential biomarker and target for precision immunotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02155621.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.087
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicEpigenetics and DNA Methylation→French-language works237,207→