Effect of intensification of induction II chemotherapy and liberalization of stem cell donor source on outcome for children with high risk acute myeloid leukemia: A report from the Children’s Oncology Group.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
10002 Background: Patients with residual acute myeloid leukemia (AML) after induction fare poorly. The recently completed AAML1031 Phase III clinical trial intensified Induction II chemotherapy, altered the stem cell transplant (SCT) conditioning regimen, and liberalized SCT donor source criteria. We sought to test whether these practice changes improved clinical outcomes. Methods: Patients on AAML0531 and AAML1031, sequential Phase III trials for AML with shared high risk features of both > 15% residual blasts by morphology and ≥ 0.1% minimal residual disease (MRD) by flow cytometry with uninformative cytogenetics or high risk cytogenetic features (-7 or -5/5q-) were included. Gemtuzmab exposed and patients with high allelic ratio FLT3 ITD were excluded. Patients were observed from the start of Induction II through last available follow up. Induction II chemotherapy (ADE or AraC/Mito) was the exposure of interest. Disease free and overall survival (DFS, OS) were the primary outcomes. Standard descriptive statistics were used to compare patient characteristics and secondary outcomes; Kaplan Meier analyses were used to evaluate DFS/OS. Results: A total of 47 patients from AAML0531 (ADE) and 95 patients from AAML1031 (AraC/Mito) were included and did not differ in baseline characteristics. Five year DFS ±2SE was 17.5 ± 11.4 for ADE and 23.9 ± 8.8 for AraC/Mito, p = 0.528. Five year OS was 38.1 ± 14.2 for ADE and 33.3 ± 10.7 for AraC/Mito, p = 0.364. End of Induction II disease response and MRD did not differ between ADE and AraC/Mito. Patients receiving ADE had a higher probability of neutrophil recovery (74% vs 53%, p = 0.019) and recovered neutrophils a median of 7 days more quickly (27 vs 34 days), p = < 0.001. ADE patients also had fewer inpatient hospital days (28 days versus 32 days, p = 0.002). The percentage of patients receiving SCT did not differ, 34% vs 44%, p = 0.253 and post-SCT outcomes did not differ. Conclusions: The intensification of Induction II chemotherapy, change in SCT conditioning regimen, and liberalization of SCT donor source was not associated with improved clinical outcomes. Intensification of Induction II was associated with increased hematologic toxicity and length of stay. These data do not support the intensification of Induction II chemotherapy with AraC/Mitoxantrone. Clinical trial information: NCT01371981.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".