Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To characterize the presentation of Terson syndrome, the occurrence of a vitreous hemorrhage in association with intracranial hemorrhage, and report on the outcomes of vitrectomy at two major centers in Canada. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of consecutive patients with Terson syndrome undergoing vitrectomy by retina specialists over the last 10 years. Primary outcome was the change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at 3 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes included the association between baseline BCVA and final BCVA, and the association between final BCVA and timing of surgery (early vs. later than 90 days). RESULTS: A total of 14 eyes of 11 patients were included. The mean time between observation of intraocular hemorrhage and vitrectomy was 160 days. Baseline preoperative BCVA was logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 1.57 ± 1.03 (Snellen 20/740), which improved to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution 0.53 ± 0.82 (Snellen 20/70) at the final postoperative follow-up, P = 0.01. Baseline BCVA was not significantly correlated with final BCVA, Spearman's rho = 0.016, P = 0.957. Final BCVA did not significantly differ between those who had surgery before 90 days compared with after 90 days, P = 0.087. CONCLUSION: Vitrectomy is safe and effective and should be considered for nonclearing vitreal bleeding due to Terson syndrome. Ocular hemorrhaging in Terson syndrome can be observed conservatively for spontaneous improvement without the risk of reduced visual potential. Ophthalmic evaluation should be considered promptly after intracranial hemorrhage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it