MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947776280 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.013

14 Brief Resolved Unexplained Events (BRUE) during the first year of life in ex-preterm infants

2019· article· en· W2947776280 on OpenAlexaff
Veronica Samedi, Martha Báez, Nilufer Hasanova, Daniel Carrillo, Diego Carrillo, Laura Rojas, Priscilla Tatrallyay, Lana Luba, Juan P Fajardo, Amin Harish, Fuad Samedi, Oleg Khassan

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInfant Health and Development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceHistoryHumanitiesMedia studiesClassicsSociologyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Current AAP recommendations suggest that incidence of SIDS/BRUE after 43 weeks of corrected gestational age (CGA) age it is not different for term and preterm infants. There is no documented association between apnea of prematurity and risk of SIDS/BRUE. In available literature, we did not find comparison between incidence of BRUE/ALTE in preterm infants who were on caffeine till 46 weeks of CGA and similar group of preterm infants with no medications. Main purpose of this study was to obtain accurate clinical information and to assess safety of current practice discharging infants home on caffeine. The objective of this study was to describe the incidence of BRUE in this population. 163 infants were divided in three groups i) Study Group: 45 Infants born less than 35 weeks GA that were clinically ready for discharge, except for apneas ii) Control Group: 83 Infants of similar age without apnea of prematurity at the time of discharge iii) Reference Group: 35 healthy infants born 36–37 weeks of GA (normal nursery population)Chart review was performed after 6 and 12 months post –discharge from hospital; all personal information was excluded from collected data. The following records were used for analysis: total number of ER visits within 6 and 12 months post-discharge from hospital; total number of admission to the pediatric wards/ intensive care unit; total number of documented upper respiratory tract infections, including bronchiolitis, and documented BRUE episodes. For patients with confirmed BRUE episodes detailed family, social and medical history was obtained from parents and care providers (pediatricians and family physicians). Out of 163 infants 5 had documented BRUE, and all these patients were from control group and were born at > 33 weeks of GA. According to BRUE clinical practice guideline 4 patients had 3 risk factors out of 7; and 1 patient had 5 out of 7. All infants came from non-smoker families; 4 were on exclusive breast-feed and 1 was on fortified formula for poor weight gain. 2 infants had events after 43 weeks of PCA. None of the patients had acute medical condition at the time of BRUE (e.g. viral infection). Ex-preterm infants for whom caffeine was discontinued in hospital had highest incidence of BRUE. Monitoring ex-preterm infants with pulse oximetry after discharge may help to identify which patients are at greatest risk of BRUE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicInfant Health and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207