Stenting in Congenital Heart Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medium- and long-term efficacy of intravascular stenting for congenital heart disease (CHD) has not been determined in Japan. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study comprised a retrospective survey of Palmaz or Palmaz Genesis stent implantation for pulmonary artery stenosis (PA), aortic coarctation, and superior and inferior vena cava lesions (SIVC) from May 1995 to February 2009, occurring in association with pre- or postoperative CHD at 14 leading hospitals. Stents were implanted in 255 patients with 312 lesions (PA, 253 lesions in 199 patients; aorta, 38 lesions in 35 patients; SIVC, 21 lesions in 21 patients). Age at the initial stenting was median 10 years, and the follow-up interval ranged from 6 to 144 months. The minimum lumen diameter (MLD) of the PA, aorta, and SIVC was increased from 4.7+/-2.1, 6.6+/-2.3, and 4.4+/-2.2 mm to 8.8+/-2.7, 12.0+/-3.8, and 9.2+/-2.6 mm, respectively (P<0.01). Cumulative freedom from redilation was 84% at 72 months, 95% at 54 months, and 81% at 50 months, for the PA, aorta, and SIVC, respectively. In 187 redilations, the MLD of the PA, aorta, and SIVC increased from 6.1+/-2.5, 7.9+/-2.9, and 5.3+/-2.4 mm, to 8.3+/-2.7, 9.8+/-3.5, and 7.3+/-1.9 mm, respectively (P<0.01). There were no deaths associated with stent implantation. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous stenting using Palmaz or Palmaz Genesis stents and redilation are now common procedures in Japan with little morbidity during the medium- and long-term follow-up period.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it