MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sarcopenia as a predictor of survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) receiving platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy.

2019· article· en· W2947849684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stuart-Allison Moffat Staley, Katherine L. Tucker, Meredith Newton, Michelle Ertel, Yingao Zhang, Irene A. Doherty, Paola A. Gehrig

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNutrition and Health in Aging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSarcopeniaTaxaneInternal medicineCancerChemotherapyOncologyBreast cancerProportional hazards model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e17030 Background: Severe skeletal muscle loss (sarcopenia) is associated with poor cancer outcomes, including reduced survival and increased treatment toxicity. This relationship has recently been demonstrated in women with metastatic breast cancer, but there is a paucity of data regarding this correlation in women with EOC. Thus, our goal was to evaluate if sarcopenia, as assessed by computed tomography (CT) morphometric measurements, was associated with worse survival outcomes in EOC patients undergoing primary platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Methods: EOC patients diagnosed between 06/2000 and 02/2017 who received treatment with platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy were included. CT abdominal images closest to the time of diagnosis were retrospectively evaluated for skeletal muscle area at the 3rd lumbar vertebrae. Measurements were obtained with use of TomoVision® radiological software (SliceOmatic – version 5.0, Quebec, Canada). Sarcopenia was defined as Skeletal Muscle Index (SMI = SMA/height2) ≤ 41. Data analysis included Kaplan-Meier plots to assess survival, and descriptive statistics was utilized to describe characteristics between the two groups. Results: 201 EOC patients were evaluated. Sixty-four percent (128/201) met criteria for sarcopenia (SMI ≤ 41) at time of diagnosis. Seventy-six percent of patients were diagnosed with Stage III or IV disease, with high-grade serous as the most common histology (74%). Median age at diagnosis was 61 years. Approximately one third were obese. Body mass index was greater in the SMI > 41 group compared to the SMI ≤ 41 group (31.3 vs 26.3, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the prevalence of chronic conditions, including diabetes, coronary artery disease, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, or tobacco use, between the two groups. The mean overall survival did not differ between patients with SMI > 41 and SMI ≤ 41 (36.5 vs 40.8 months, p = 0.4, respectively). Conclusions: Based on this patient cohort, sarcopenia was not associated with worse survival outcomes in EOC patients receiving first-line platinum and taxane-based chemotherapy. Further prospective studies are needed to explore other diagnostics that may allow us to provide improved accuracy and individualization in the care of women with advanced ovarian cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.369 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicNutrition and Health in Aging→French-language works237,207→