MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Utilization of mental health services among survivors of testicular cancer: A population-based study.

2019· article· en· W2947850872 on OpenAlexaffabout
Christopher M. Booth, Michael J. Raphael, Xuejiao Wei, Cláudio N. Soares, Philippe L. Bédard, Michael Leveridge, D. Robert Siemens, Andrew Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTesticular diseases and treatments
Canadian institutionsKingston Health Sciences CentrePrincess Margaret Cancer CentreQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrchiectomyTesticular cancerMental healthCohortCancer registryPopulationSeminomaDistressCancerEmergency medicineGynecologySurgeryInternal medicinePsychiatryChemotherapyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e16062 Background: Testicular cancer survivors may experience long-term psychological distress related to their diagnosis and treatment. Measurement of mental health service use (MHS) is an objective way to quantify the incurred burden of psychological distress. Here we describe patterns of MHS use among survivors of testicular cancer in a single-payer health system. Methods: The Ontario Cancer Registry was linked to electronic treatment records to identify all incident cases of testicular cancer treated with orchiectomy in the Canadian province of Ontario during 2004-2010. Mental health clinical visits were identified from records of hospital admission, emergency room visits and out-patient physician billing records. Results: The study cohort included 1877 patients; mean age was 35 and 61% had pure seminoma. Two thirds of patients (66%, 1230/1877) were initially treated with active surveillance. In the 2-year period prior to orchiectomy, 24% (443/1877) of patients had MHS use. Post-orchiectomy, the prevalence of MHS use was 18% (331/1877), 23% (431/1877) and 30% (572/1877) at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. The use of MHS was greatest in the peri-diagnostic/surgical period. Rates of MHS visits, 3 months before, 0-3 months after, 4-6 months after and 2 years after orchiectomy were 11%, 14%, 10%, and 6%, respectively. Post-orchiectomy MHS use was greatest among those with baseline MHS use. The prevalence of MHS use for patients with and without baseline MHS use was 40% (175/443) vs 11% (156/1434, p < 0.001) at 6 months; 51% (225/443) vs 14% (206/1434, p < 0.001) at 12 months; and 61% (271/443) vs 21% (301/1434, p < 0.001) at 24 months post-orchiectomy. Post-orchiectomy MHS use did not vary by initial treatment strategy (active surveillance vs upfront treatment, p = 0.435). Older patients were more likely to have MHS visits at all time periods than younger patients; MHS rates at 6 months were 15% (93/631) vs 18% (112/625) vs 20% (126/621) for ages 16-29, 30-39, and 40+ years respectively (p = 0.035). Conclusions: MHS use among survivors of testicular cancer is common, particularly in the peri-diagnostic and surgical period. The rate of MHS use is highest among those patients with a history of prior MHS use. Clinicians should screen for the presence of psychological distress among survivors of testicular cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score0.925

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.479
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Oncology→Same topicTesticular diseases and treatments→French-language works237,207→