Large Cells With CD30 Expression and Hodgkin-like Features in Primary Cutaneous Marginal Zone B-Cell Lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The presence of CD30 cells in cutaneous lymphomas has come to prominence in recent years as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic marker. In primary cutaneous marginal zone B-cell lymphomas, the presence of large CD30 cells with Hodgkin-like features and their significance have not yet been studied. Here we describe the main clinical, histologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular characteristics of 13 cases of primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphomas featuring >10% of CD30 large cells, and analyze their relationship with histologic and clinical progression of the disease and with other morphologic and immunophenotypic features. We report 10 male and 3 female patients, 4 with early-local disease and 8 with locoregional advanced disease without extracutaneous involvement but with a high relapse rate of 69%. We describe an association between a high level of CD30 expression and disease progression, with increased clinical recurrence in cases with >15% of CD30 cells. We also discuss the differential diagnosis with other cutaneous and systemic lymphomas, especially Hodgkin lymphoma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".