Pembrolizumab (pembro) plus enzalutamide (enza) in abiraterone (abi)-pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Cohort C of the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 study.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
5010 Background: Pembro has activity as monotherapy in pts with pretreated advanced mCRPC. A phase 2 study suggested that pembro + enza after progression on enza may have clinical activity. Data from cohort C (pembro + enza) of KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573), a phase 1b/2 umbrella study to test combinations in mCRPC, are presented. Methods: Pts who were unsuccessful with or became intolerant to ≥4 weeks of abi in the prechemotherapy mCRPC state, with either PSA or radiologic progression within 6 mo before screening were included. Pts received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W with enza 160 mg/day orally. Primary end points were safety and PSA response rate (confirmed PSA decrease ≥50%). Key secondary end points were investigator-assessed ORR (RECIST v1.1), disease control rate (DCR: CR+PR+SD ≥6 mo), time to PSA progression, rPFS, and OS. Results: 69 pts began treatment (median age, 69 y; visceral disease, 26%; measurable disease, 36%). Median (95% CI) follow-up was 9 (7-13) mo. Efficacy is outlined in the table. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 63 (91%) pts; most frequent (≥20%) were fatigue (30%), rash (23%), and nausea (22%). Grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs occurred in 28 (41%) pts; most common was rash (10%); no deaths were from treatment-related AEs. Conclusions: The pembro + enza combination showed sustained activity in abi-pretreated chemotherapy-naive mCRPC. AEs were considered tolerable for the treatment combination; incidence of rash resolved with standard-of-care treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573. [Table: see text]
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".