MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2947994284 · doi:10.1093/pch/pxz066.081

82 Detecting Abdominal Visceral Injury in Cases of Suspected Physical Abuse

2019· article· en· W2947994284 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Burke Baird, Laurel Chauvin‐Kimoff, Jennifer MacPherson, Louise Murray, Jillian Popel

Bibliographic record

VenuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOccultAbdominal traumaAbdomenElevated transaminasesPancreatic injuryBluntTransaminaseInternal medicineSurgeryPathologyPancreatitis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abdominal visceral injury is an uncommon but serious form of physical abuse. Most cases of abusive visceral injury are clinically occult and are at risk of going undiagnosed. Current recommendations suggest screening children with suspicious injuries for occult visceral trauma by measuring serum hepatic transaminases and pancreatic enzymes (primarily lipase) and ordering a CT scan of the abdomen for children with an AST or ALT ≥ 80 mmol/L, a lipase ≥ 100 mmol/L or clinical signs of intra-abdominal injury. This approach was proposed to the Child Maltreatment pediatricians at the 2015 Canadian Symposium on Advanced Practices in Child Maltreatment and was informally adopted by several Canadian Child Maltreatment programs. To review our group’s experience with employing the recommended approach to detecting inflicted visceral injury. A retrospective review of the group’s experience with this approach was completed by the Visceral Trauma Working Group for the October 2018 Symposium. Anonymized data from three centres for the period from January 2016-July 2018 was available for review. In two centres, data on patients who had screening transaminases/lipase and/or abdominal visceral injury was reviewed. In one centre a prospectively collected clinical database was reviewed. 200 children had transaminase +/- lipase measurements. Nine (4.5%) had an AST or ALT ≥ 80 mmol/L. None had a lipase ≥ 100 mmol/L. Ten children had an abdominal CT scan because of elevated transaminases and/or clinical signs/symptoms of blunt torso trauma. Five of the 10 patients had an abdominal visceral injury. No intestinal injuries were identified. Only one child had a visceral injury detected purely as a result of screening blood tests. Physical abuse was suspected as the cause of the visceral injury in 4 of the 5 cases and in all 4, the child was ≤ 5 years of age. Data on suspicious injuries present in screened children was available from one centre. One of 5 children with visceral injury had abdominal bruising and none had chest bruising or greater than 10 suspicious bruises. Following the currently recommended approach in this small group of children resulted in the detection of visceral injury in only one child who did not have other evidence of blunt torso trauma. Given the low incidence of clinically occult visceral injury in this population, a larger study is needed to determine the importance of age, clinical factors and clinically evident injuries when a decision to screen for possible inflicted abdominal visceral injury is being made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.301 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaediatrics & Child HealthSame topicAutopsy Techniques and OutcomesFrench-language works237,207