Distribution and morphology of inner-shelf sand bodies off southwest Newfoundland based on merged multibeam sonar and LiDAR data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The inner shelf off southwest Newfoundland, bordering the Laurentian Channel, was mapped with multi-beam sonar between depths of 200 and ∼20 m, overlapping with coverage by marine/terrestrial LiDAR from maximum depths of 30 m to above sea level. The new data provide the first clear view of linkages between terrestrial and nearshore coastal systems and the inner shelf. Offshore sand reservoirs associated with adjacent sandy coastal barriers and spits are thin (∼2 m), and isolated from one another, so that bedrock is the dominant seafloor terrain on the inner most shelf. The offshore sand reservoirs link with complex nearshore bar systems, from which it is inferred that sediment exchange with terrestrial systems can occur. Several isolated sand bodies are interpreted as residuals from former coastal systems destroyed during the Holocene transgression. The new data reveal the unexpected existence of a submarine canyon that facilitates transport of sediment from the inner shelf into the deep glacial trough of the Laurentian Channel.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".