1308-P: Improved Transition in Young Adults with Diabetes: A Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: The transition from pediatric to adult diabetes care is a vulnerable period for youth with diabetes. During transition, youth with diabetes are at high risk for loss to follow-up, worsening glycemic control, and increased hospitalizations. Objective: Our objective was to assess the effect of a technology enhanced transition coordinator on loss to follow-up in youth with diabetes transitioning from pediatric to adult diabetes care. Methods: This open label, pre-post pragmatic clinical trial, assessed the effect of a technology enhanced transition coordinator in transitioning young adults with diabetes from pediatric to adult diabetes care. Our primary outcome was the rate of loss to follow-up defined as no outpatient diabetes appointments in the one year following transfer. The usual care (control) cohort were youth with diabetes who received usual care (i.e., transition preparation during pediatric diabetes appointments prior to transfer). The intervention cohort received the usual care and had a transition coordinator who assisted them through the transition period with regular, per protocol contact, by texting, emailing, Twitter®, and/or postings on a private Facebook® page. Results: Baseline average hemoglobin A1c was not different between the intervention cohort [number (n) = 101, 47.5% females] versus the usual care cohort (n= 209, 49.3% female) [8.9 ± 2.0 standard deviation (SD) versus 9.1 ± 2.4 SD, p=0.28] in the year prior to transfer. In the year following transfer, 49.3% of young adults in the usual care cohort versus 11.8% of young adults in the intervention group did not attend any outpatient diabetes appointments (p< 0.01) in the year following transfer. Conclusions: Our technology enhanced transition coordinator intervention was successful in reducing loss to follow-up in transitioning young adults with diabetes. Importantly, this program used simple readily accessible technologies which increases the transferability and sustainability of this intervention. Disclosure S. Butalia: None. A. McGuire: None. S. Crawford: None. D. Dyjur: None. J. Mercer: None. D. Pacaud: Other Relationship; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Sandoz, TOLMAR. Funding Lawson Foundation
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".