MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948233123

Perceptions of conformity during the student teaching placement

2001· dissertation· en· W2948233123 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University) · 2001
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTeacher Education and Leadership Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConformityPerceptionPsychologyMathematics educationSocial psychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this study was to examine the issue of conformity and the relationship \nbetween student teachers and associate teachers during the pre-service practicum. The three \nquestions that guided this research included: (a) Did associate teachers expect pre-service \nteachers to mirror their practices during the practicum? (b) Did student teachers describe and \nexpectation of conformity within their field experience?; and (c) What circumstances during the \npracticum increased the likelihood of conformity? \nThis study was conducted with a sample of student teachers and associate teachers during \nthe 1999 - 2000 school term at one Ontario university, and it consisted of two phases of data \ncollection. The first stage involved preliminary interviews with one student teacher on two \nseparate occasions. The data from these interviews guided the surveys that were distributed to \nstudent teachers and associate teachers in the second phase of data collection. \nThis study found that associate teachers indicated that conformity occurred, and a fraction \nof these participants clearly expressed a desire for this behaviour. Other associate teachers may \nhave implied this expectation through communication, feedback, and their actions. The student \nteachers suggested that conformity occurred in smaller numbers. Some participants expressed \nthat it was a requirement of the practicum, while others felt that conformity occurred out of \nrespect for the associate teacher. \nWith reference to the factors that contributed to conformity, a perceived expectation of \nconformity and an associate teacher with more than 20 years of experience all increased the rate \nof conformity with this group of participants. If student teachers observed for one week at the \nstart of their practicum and then proceeded to teach 3 - 4 lessons per day, they reduced their risk \no f conformity. Additional variables aside from the ones presently stated were also examined \nwithin this research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.021
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.021
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKnowledge Commons (Lakehead University)Same topicTeacher Education and Leadership StudiesFrench-language works237,207