KAJIAN TINGKAT KEBISINGAN KOMPLEK PERMUKIMAN DI RUANG PERUNTUKAN PERDAGANGAN DAN JASA DI KOTA JAMBI
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Merujuk pada Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah Kota Jambi Tahun 2013-2033, salah satu ruang peruntukan perdagangan dan jasa di kota Jambi adalah di jalan Prof. Dr. Soemantri Brojonegoro Kelurahan Solok Sipin Kota Jambi yang diambil sebagai lokasi penelitian mewakili Kota Jambi. Namun, pada ruang tersebut terdapat komplek permukiman. Dengan demikian bila di ruang peruntukan perdagangan dan jasa terdapat permukiman, maka baku mutu lingkungan tingkat kebisingan cenderung melampaui baku mutu tingkat kebisingan permukiman, yakni > 55 dB (A).Untuk mengkaji tingkat kebisingan dilingkungan permukiman yang berada pada wilayah peruntukan perdagangan dan jasa merujuk ke Keputusan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup Nomor : 48/MENLH/XI/1996 Tentang Baku Tingkat Kebisingan yaitu Parameter kebisingan Ekivalen (Leq), kebisingan rata-rata (Levg), kebisingan minimum (Lmin), dan kebisingan maksimum (Lmax).Tingkat kebisingan di komplek permukiman Kota Jambi yang terletak di ruang peruntukan perdagangan dan jasa sudah di atas baku mutu lingkungan, yakni : 1. Tingkat Kebisingan Ekivalen = 62,4 dB (A); 2. Tingkat Kebisingan Rata-rata = 62,2 dB (A); 3. Tingkat Kebisingan Minimum =60,2 dB (A); dan 4. Tingkat Kebisingan Maksimum = 64,3 dB (A)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it