MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948419207 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/jez118.030

P443Simplified Splenic Switch Off - an easy method for determining adequacy of vasodilation during adenosine stress CMR

2019· article· en· W2948419207 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patricia Lymburner, Matthew Webber, J. Neill, W. Strugnell, Christian Hamilton‐Craig

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdenosineVasodilationCardiologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Adenosine stress CMR relies on adequate vasodilator stress to assess myocardial perfusion. A proportion of patients are inadequately vasodilated using 140mcg/kg/min adenosine, and heart rate rise alone is an inadequate marker of coronary hyperaemia. "Splenic Switch Off" (SSO) has been shown to identify adequate adenosine response due to the A1 A2B receptor mediated vasoconstriction of the spleen, as shown in a sub-analysis of the CEMARC trial. Failed SSO response identifies under-stressed patients who may therefore have false-negative stress perfusion CMR scans. However, not all sites perform rest perfusion imaging in their standard stress CMR protocols. There is a clinical need for a streamlined approach to assess vasodilator efficacy during adenosine stress CMR. Purpose: We tested a simplified methodology to assess for vasodilator efficacy by comparing peak blood and baseline vs peak splenic signal during adenosine stress CMR. Methods: 15 patients undergoing clinical stress CMR were retrospectively reviewed under ethics approval. Adenosine was infused at 140mcg/kg/min, and free breathing motion-corrected stress MRI images acquired (Siemens MAGNETOM Aera 1.5T). All patients had SSFP imaging for ventricular function, and late gadolinium enhancement imaging, with no rest perfusion imaging (as per institutional protocol). Patients were dichotomised into having either adequate SSO or non-SSO response based on visual analysis by two SCMR Level 3 readers. Quantitative regions of interest (ROI) were drawn in the blood pool, the myocardium, and the spleen at baseline and peak vasodilation during gadobutrol infusion by a blinded observer using (Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Calgary, Canada; Version 5.6). Results: Baseline splenic signal increased on average 2-fold in subjects with adequate SSO response, whereas in non-SSO patients the splenic signal increased 6-fold from baseline (p = 0.0011) indicating failed splenic vasoconstriction. Peak splenic signal expressed as a percentage of peak blood signal was 18% in SSO patients indicating low relative signal from splenic vasoconstriction, but was 72% in non-SSO patients (p = 0.047) indicating lack of splenic vasoconstriction [FIGURE: upper panel note dark spleen compared to blood pool, lower panel note bright spleen] Conclusion: A simplified approach using ROIs in the blood pool and spleen allows rapid identification of adequate SSO during stress CMR without rest perfusion imaging. This allows opportunity to increase the adenosine dose on-the-fly and potentially reduce false negative scans. Abstract P443 Figure. Upper dark spleen, Lower bright spleen

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Heart Journal - Cardiovascular ImagingSame topicCardiac Imaging and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207