MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948445272 · doi:10.11159/ffhmt19.145

Maximizing Mass Transfer Using Highly Curved Helical Pipes: A CFD Investigation

2019· article· en· W2948445272 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the ... International Conference on Fluid Flow, Heat and Mass Transfer · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational fluid dynamicsMass transferMechanicsComputer scienceMarine engineeringMechanical engineeringAerospace engineeringMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Membrane contactors are considered as one of the most promising intensification technologies for gas-liquid absorption processes in food, chemistry, energy and pharmaceutical industries. Two strategies can be applied in order to push process intensification: maximize mass transfer coefficients and maximize the specific membrane surface area (i.e. packing density) of the module. Dean vortices generation is one of the most efficient way for mass transfer improvement but requires helical shape membranes. Consequently, a combined packing geometry and mass transfer study is needed in order to evaluate the optimal performances of helical hollow fiber membrane modules. This work aimed to achieve that target through a systematic analysis of mass transfer performances in highly curved hollow membrane contactors. The impact of the nondimensional numbers * , * (respectively the helical radius and helical pitch both nondimensionalized by the pipe diameter ) on mass transfer was evaluated numerically by using CFD. Helical hollow fiber membranes with lengths ranging from 30 to 6000 , nondimensional helical diameters * between 0.05 and 10, and nondimensional helical pitches * between 1.25 and 15 were studied. In addition, mass transfer in packed membrane modules is analyzed thanks to a mass transfer enhancement factor , which is equal to the mass transfer ratio / (comparing the Sherwood number of helical and straight pipes) multiplied by the packing density ratio / (comparing the packing density of helical and straight pipes). It is shown that enhancement is maximal for highly curved helical pipes. For example, for a Schmidt number of 10, highly curved pipes allow reaching a value, which is about 4 times larger than that of a straight tube. For a Schmidt number 1000, the mass transfer efficiency can be enhanced by one order of magnitude.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.865

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it