MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948529721

Exploring the Nature of a Holistic and Meditative School

2019· article· en· W2948529721 on OpenAlexaff
Ashwani Kumar

Bibliographic record

Venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of Education · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdult and Continuing Education Topics
Canadian institutionsMount Saint Vincent University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolistic educationTransformative learningPedagogyFocus groupSociologyCurriculumGrounded theorySpiritualityQualitative researchPsychologyEngineering ethicsEpistemologyMathematics educationSocial scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents the findings of a three-month-long case study of Brockwood Park School (BPS), an alternative and holistic educational institution located in the UK. Using an emergent, flexible and participants-oriented methodology grounded in meditative inquiry, the study explores how a holistic and meditative curriculum shapes the living reality of BPS. A triangulated approach was employed in which observations, interviews, and focus group discussions were used in the collection of data. Results reached highlight four main findings: 1) self-understanding and intersubjective relations are at the core of BPS educational philosophy; 2) full-time faculty and many non-residential teachers join BPS because of an interest in the philosophical and educational ideas of Krishnamurti; 3) BPS provides a safe and inquiry-based learning environment to students and teachers; 4) BPS offers a promising humanistic and holistic educational approach. The paper then concludes with a discussion of the problems presently facing Brockwood. The contributions of this study are manifold: it emphasizes the educational importance of transformative education as exemplified in BPS; it provides a working model of how meditative inquiry can be used in conducting qualitative research; and demonstrates how holistic and meditative education support children’s growth and development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.157
Threshold uncertainty score0.854

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2019 Conference of the Canadian Society for the Study of EducationSame topicAdult and Continuing Education TopicsFrench-language works237,207