MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948534166 · doi:10.2337/db19-1090-p

1090-P: Reaching ADA Glycemic Targets without Hypoglycemia during Titration with Gla-300 and IDeg in T2DM: Exploratory Analyses from BRIGHT

2019· article· en· W2948534166 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ronan Roussel, Juan P. Frías, Jukka Westerbacka, Zsolt Bosnyák, Lydie Melas‐Melt, Lori Berard, Alice Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Management and Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypoglycemiaGlycemicMedicineInsulin glargineInsulinInsulin degludecPlasma glucoseRandomized controlled trialBasal insulinEndocrinologyInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusType 2 diabetes

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Guidelines emphasize achieving glycemic targets without hypoglycemia. BRIGHT demonstrated similar HbA1c reduction and less anytime (24 h) hypoglycemia with insulin glargine 300 U/mL (Gla-300) vs. insulin degludec 100 U/mL (IDeg) during the initial 12-week insulin titration period, in insulin-naïve adults with T2DM. We investigated achievement of ADA-recommended HbA1c and fasting self-monitored plasma glucose (FSMPG) targets without confirmed (≤70 mg/dL) hypoglycemia in the first 12 weeks. BRIGHT was a 24-week, multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase 4 trial. Participants were randomized to Gla-300 (n=466) or IDeg (n=463), titrated to a FSMPG of 80-100 mg/dL (below ADA-recommended FSMPG target of ≤130 mg/dL). A similar proportion of participants at week 8 achieved HbA1c <7% without hypoglycemia in both groups; this proportion was numerically higher with Gla-300 than IDeg at week 12 (16.9% vs. 13.6%). From baseline to week 5, numerically more patients with IDeg achieved FSMPG ≤130 mg/dL without hypoglycemia vs. Gla-300, but from week 6 to 12 this was reversed (Figure). More participants achieved ADA-recommended glycemic targets without hypoglycemia with Gla-300 vs. IDeg during the titration period of BRIGHT. These second-generation basal insulin analogs may allow more aggressive titration after insulin initiation in T2DM. Disclosure R. Roussel: Advisory Panel; Self; Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Physiogenex. Research Support; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. J.P. Frias: Advisory Panel; Self; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Echosens, Genentech, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zafgen, Inc. Research Support; Self; AbbVie Inc., Akcea Therapeutics, Allergan, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer US, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cirius Therapeutics, Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GENFIT, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, TaiwanJ Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Theracos, Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi. J. Westerbacka: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. Z. Bosnyak: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. L. Melas-Melt: Consultant; Self; Sanofi. L. Berard: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company. Consultant; Self; Abbott, Ascensia Diabetes Care, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LifeScan Canada, Mylan, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Montmed Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc. A.Y. Cheng: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, HLS Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Abbott, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., mdBriefCase Group Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Funding Sanofi (NCT02738151)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.010
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.055

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0100.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes Management and ResearchFrench-language works237,207