Bibliographic record
Abstract
Changes in the protease-gluten protein system of wheat endosperm during post-maturity germination (and sprouting) were investigated in relation to "sprouting damage" of breadmaking potential. Protease activity, which is negligible in sound wheat, increased substantially during germination under laboratory conditions. Endoprotease activity increased more than exoprotease activity. Concomitant changes in the flour proteins were consistent with the observed increase in proteolytic activity. The most significant change, in relation to breadmaking potential, was the gradual decrease in the proportion of insoluble glutenin and an equivalent increase in the proportion of soluble glutenin plus low MW. protein components. The observed changes in breadmaking potential were consistent with the changes in protein solubility. In the case of the standard quality Canadian bread wheat variety (cv. Neepawa), breadmaking potential (loaf volume) deteriorated with degree of sprouting damage. On the other hand, the variety with very strong gluten (cv. Glenlea) showed an improvement in breadmaking potential with limited sprouting damage and a subsequent deterioration with additional sprouting damage. It is concluded that changes in the protease-gluten proteins system contribute significantly to the loss of breadmaking potential during sprouting and that wheat varieties can be selected, in terms of gluten strength, for improved tolerance of sprouting damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".