Development of Techniques for Composite Parts Failure Analysis in Static and Fatigue Mode - Application on Thermoset and Thermoplastic Materials for Rotorcraft Main Rotor Hub Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A model defined at the ply scale to predict the failure of laminated composites for static or fatigue loading is proposed. The model describes the loss of strength in the fiber direction for a significant level of transverse damage. This meso-scale model has been characterized on woven ply laminates used for rotorcraft dynamic components, such as glass/epoxy of Starflex®, carbon fiber/epoxy, and carbon fiber/PEEK of H160 main rotor hub. Failure behavior prediction at coupon level has been validated regarding static and fatigue failure mode in tension for epoxy resin woven ply laminates. Characterizations have been also provided for PEEK resin in balanced woven ply laminate, regarding static or fatigue failure mode. Those activities are crucial to increase the level of confidence in failure model, to rely on virtual testing at coupons level, and to better predict damage and failure at component level. This work intends to support the building block approach during development and certification of such critical applications for rotorcraft.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".