MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948605909 · doi:10.22215/etd/2015-10889

Deconstructing the Superblock: Universal Solutions vs. Cultural Specificity in Chinese Urban Planning

2015· dissertation· en· W2948605909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUrban Design and Spatial Analysis
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaUrbanizationContext (archaeology)Urban planningHomogeneousSustainabilityGeographyHistory of ChinaScale (ratio)Economic geographyPolitical scienceSociologyEconomic growthCivil engineeringCartographyEngineeringEcologyArchaeologyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the introduction of economic reforms in 1978, an astonishing 300 million Chinese have relocated to cities. As a result, the built-up area of China's cities has expanded more than fourfold. The build-out of the periphery is occurring at the scale of the neighbourhood, with individual developers controlling massive parcels of land. More often than not, the neighborhoods they produce consist of repetitive towers corralled into gated superblocks that are separated by wide, arterial streets. The very embodiment of expediency, these tower ensembles also adhere closely to modernist principles of urban planning, many of which have been challenged in the West.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.783

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicUrban Design and Spatial AnalysisFrench-language works237,207