MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948937621 · doi:10.1130/abs/2019ne-328160

DETRITAL ZIRCON GEOCHRONOLOGY IN GANDERIAN AND AVALONIAN TERRANES OF CAPE BRETON ISLAND AND SOUTHERN NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES

2019· article· en· W2948937621 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deanne van Rooyen, Sandra M. Barr, Chris E. White

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of America · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZirconTerraneGeologyPrecambrianCratonGeochronologyProvenanceGeochemistryEarth sciencePaleontologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The definition of Ganderian and Avalonian terranes in the northern Appalachian orogen is based on a long history of inquiry on multiple fronts. Differences in magmatic and metamorphic events and in isotopic characteristics have been used most commonly to separate terranes from each other, and to subdivide them internally. However, detrital zircon geochronology has made increasingly important contributions in recent years and has provided information regarding source areas for Ganderian and Avalonian terranes during their pre-Appalachian evolution. This work is hampered by difficulties in interpreting the provenance of Meso- to Neoproterozoic zircon grains typically interpreted as derived from the West African and/or Amazonian cratons. For example, 1.4 – 1.0 Ga zircon grains can be derived from a number of long-lived magmatic systems in arcs and continental settings associated with the Grenville orogen. The well-documented preservation bias for Grenville-aged zircon grains makes this problem even more difficult to address. In syn- and post-collisional strata all along the Appalachian orogen, distinctions among detrital zircon populations become even more problematic because of the potential Laurentian contribution, which mirrors many of the Meso- to Neoproterozoic source areas in the Amazonian and West African cratons. These younger strata also commonly contain large populations of magmatic zircon grains derived from arc and other magmatic activity during the Ordovician through Devonian accretionary and collisional phases of the Appalachian orogen, making it even more difficult to see the Precambrian contributions and to interpret source areas from small populations of grains. On-going work in Precambrian rocks of the Ganderian Bras d’Or and Brookville terranes in Nova Scotia and New Brunswick has shown that these terranes preserve rocks from a former passive margin of Gondwana, arc rocks formed in Pan-African subduction zones, and rocks formed during the initial stages of rifting of Ganderia from Gondwana. The dominant contributions of zircon grains are from the Amazonian craton, with signatures distinct from those typical of Avalonian rocks of the same age range. In post-collisional strata from the same terranes, consistent distinctions are much more difficult to observe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.006
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAbstracts with programs - Geological Society of AmericaSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207