MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2948949321 · doi:10.1109/tnsm.2019.2946949

Probabilistic Virtual Link Embedding Under Demand Uncertainty

2019· article· en· W2948949321 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Hosseini, Alexander James, Majid Ghaderi

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceTestbedProbabilistic logicEmbeddingMathematical optimizationBandwidth (computing)Distributed computingTRACE (psycholinguistics)Optimization problemNetwork congestionAlgorithmComputer networkNetwork packetMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper considers the problem of mapping virtual links to physical network paths, referred to as Virtual Link Embedding (VLE), under the condition that bandwidth demands of virtual links are uncertain. To realize virtual links with predictable performance, the mapping is required to guarantee a bound on the congestion probability of the physical paths that embed the virtual links. To this end, we consider a general uncertainty model in which bandwidth demands of virtual links are expressed by random variables for which only the mean and variance (or a range) are known. We formulate the VLE problem as a nonlinear optimization program and design an algorithm called Equal Partition VLE (epVLE) to solve the problem by employing an approximate formulation that results in a second-order cone program (SOCP) that can be solved efficiently even for large networks. We then provide simulation results as well as model-driven and trace-driven experimental results from an SDN testbed to show the utility and efficiency of the epVLE algorithm in various network scenarios. We apply epVLE to commonly studied small networks as well as randomly generated large networks. Our results show that epVLE is able to satisfy the required link congestion constraint, and that it produces results that are very close to those obtained from the exact optimization model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.973
Threshold uncertainty score0.909

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network and Service ManagementSame topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207