MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2949038452 · doi:10.2337/db19-2017-p

2017-P: Gut Microbes after Bariatric Surgery in Humans Improve Glucose Control in Mice without Fat Loss

2019· article· en· W2949038452 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fernando F. Anhê, Kevin P. Foley, Nicole G. Barra, Brittany M. Duggan, Joseph F. Cavallari, Brandyn D. Henriksbo, Patrice D. Cani, Laurent Biertho, André Tchernof, André Marette, Jonathan D. Schertzer

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFecesGlycemicBiliopancreatic DiversionMedicineObesityCarbohydrate metabolismGut floraWeight lossInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusPhysiologyGastroenterologyBiologySurgeryEndocrinologyImmunologyGastric bypass

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bariatric surgery (BS) is the most efficacious treatment against severe obesity and T2D. Among bariatric procedures, biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) can produce superior metabolic benefits compared with other surgical options. The mechanisms by which BPD-DS improve metabolic health are not well-understood, but there is evidence implicating the gut microbiota (GM) as contributor to changes in adiposity and consequently blood glucose control. We aimed to determine how the GM before and after BPD-DS alter host metabolism. Fecal samples from female patients subjected to BPD-DS were collected before (pre-surgery) and 12 months after surgery (post-surgery) and used to colonize female C57BL6NTac mice housed either in germ-free (GF) or SPF conditions. Oral glucose tolerance (OGT) was assessed in mice 3 and 7 weeks post-colonization. Three weeks after fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), glucose tolerance was similar in GF mice receiving pre- and post-surgery fecal slurries. However, GF mice had lower glucose during OGT test 7 weeks after FMT derived from BPD-DS post-surgery compared to GF mice receiving pre-surgery fecal slurry. No changes in fat mass accretion were seen between pre- and post-surgery mice. SPF mice colonized with the fecal microbiota pre- and post-surgery showed no difference in glucose tolerance after 3 and 7 weeks of FMT. These data suggest that the GM after BPD-DS is an independent and transmissible contributor to improved host glucose control. Furthermore, while our data show that the mouse model (e.g., SPF vs. GF) dictates the glycemic response to FMT, exposure time (e.g., at least 7 weeks) is a key factor in microbe transmissible changes in glycemia. Disclosure F. Forato Anhê: None. K.P. Foley: None. N.G. Barra: None. B.M. Duggan: None. J.F. Cavallari: None. B.D. Henriksbo: None. P.D. Cani: Board Member; Self; A-Mansia Biotech. Consultant; Self; Biocodex, Pilèje, Valbiotis. Research Support; Self; Tate & Lyle. Stock/Shareholder; Self; A-Mansia Biotech, Enterosys. L. Biertho: None. A. Tchernof: Research Support; Self; Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, Medtronic, Pfizer Inc. A. Marette: Advisory Panel; Self; Plexus, Valbiotis. Consultant; Self; Danone Nutricia Research. J.D. Schertzer: None. Funding Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Diabetes Canada

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.047
Threshold uncertainty score0.156

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0470.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetes→Same topicGut microbiota and health→French-language works237,207→