Fluoro-Anhydrite Compositions with a Light Filler Based on Expanded Perlite Sand
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Lightweight concrete is widely used in our day as a filling material for sandwich panels in the construction industry. On the other hand, the use of gypsum in this aspect is very limited. Block or panels as partition walls produced by foamed or porous gypsum has not been widely publicised. According to literature, similar types of gypsum panels are produced and used in Israel and the former East Germany. During our literature survey, using polystyrene beads as an aggregate for the production of the gypsum blocks or panels has not been discovered. In this study, we have observed the use and production gypsum composites, using polystyrene beads. Even though it is possible to mix polystyrene beads and gypsum without additives, better results are obtained by wetting the beads using a glue with a polymer base for binding as the mixture become more homogeneous. Production is planned for samples between 200kg/m and 800kg/m density, among those 500-600 kg/m mixtures have been found to be the most economical ones and the cavities filled with gypsum up to the maximum extent. Even though the mechanical strength is not a critical issue for these samples, it is found to be sufficient, in addition good heat insulation and fire retardant properties has been observed. Due to the above mentioned properties, polystyrene aggregated gypsum can be used in precast or cast in situ panels as a filling material.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it