MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2949064934 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1244

Nuclear kinematics in nearby AGN – I. An ALMA perspective on the morphology and kinematics of the molecular CO(2–1) emission

2019· article· en· W2949064934 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Venkatessh Ramakrishnan, Neil M. Nagar, Carolina Finlez, Thaisa Storchi‐Bergmann, R. Slater, Allan Schnorr-Müller, Rogemar A. Riffel, C. G. Mundell, A. Robinson

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFondo Nacional de Desarrollo Científico y TecnológicoNational Institutes of Natural SciencesAsociación Universitaria Iberoamericana de PostgradoKorea Astronomy and Space Science InstituteNational Research Council CanadaConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoAlberta Livestock and Meat AgencyNational Science Foundation of Sri LankaFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do SulEuropean School of Oncology
KeywordsPhysicsKinematicsAstrophysicsGalaxyRotation (mathematics)Position angleGalaxy rotation curveAstronomyGalaxy formation and evolutionGeometryClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the molecular gas morphology and kinematics of seven nearby Seyfert galaxies obtained from our 230 GHz ALMA observations. The CO J = 2−1 kinematics within the inner ∼30 arcsec (≲9 kpc) reveals rotation patterns that have been explored using the Bertola rotation model and a modified version of the Kinemetry package. The latter algorithm reveals various deviations from pure circular rotation in the inner kiloparsec of all seven galaxies, including kinematic twists, decoupled, and counter-rotating cores. A comparison of the global molecular gas and stellar kinematics shows overall agreement in the position angle of the major axis and the systemic velocity, but larger discrepancies in the disc inclination. The residual maps obtained with both the methods show the presence of non-circular motions in most of the galaxies. Despite its importance, a detailed interpretation of the physics responsible for non-circular motions will be discussed in a forthcoming work.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicGalaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena→French-language works237,207→