MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949183212 · doi:10.1093/ndt/gfz106.fp687

FP687THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN INTRA-DIALYTIC SYMPTOM CLUSTERS AND RECOVERY TIME IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING CHRONIC HEMODIALYSIS: AN EXPLORATORY ANALYSIS

2019· article· en· W2949183212 on OpenAlexaffabout
Arrti Bhasin, K. Scott Brimble, Christian G. Rabbat, Jason W. Busse, Amber O. Molnar, Jessica Tyrwhitt, Andrea Mazzetti, Michael Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueNephrology Dialysis Transplantation · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicBlood donation and transfusion practices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemodialysisIntensive care medicineAssociation (psychology)Internal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Individuals receiving hemodialysis may experience symptoms during a hemodialysis treatment and freuqently report feeling unwell after dialysis. The time it takes to recover from a dialysis treatment is called the recovery time, an important aspect of quality of life. We explored the relationship between symptoms during dialysis, recovery time and health related quality of life. METHODS: WE conducted a prospective observational study of 118 prevalent hemodialysis patients in two Canadian centers. Participants were asked to report the degree to which they experienced 10 intra-dialytic symptoms at each dialysis treatment for a week and the time it took to recover from each dialysis treatment as well as health related quality of life (using the Kidney Disease and Quality-of-Life-Short Form [KDQoL-SF36]) for the week. Principal component analysis was used to identify clusters of inter-related intra-dialytic symptoms. Mixed-effects, ordinal regression was used to examine the association of symptom clusters and recovery time, and the mental component score (MCS) and physical component score (PCS) of the KDQoL-SF36. RESULTS: Principal component analysis identified two symptom clusters explaining 39% of the total variance. The first cluster included symtoms of nervousness, lack of energy, muscle cramps, back pain and muscle soreness, whereas the second cluster included nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, chest pain and headaches. After adjusting for patient characteristics, the first cluster of symptoms was significantly associated with longer post-dialysis recovery time (OR=1.72; 95% CI=1.29, 2.30). The first cluster of symptoms was also significantly associated with decreased MCS and PCS scores. The second cluster of symptoms was not significantly associated with post-dialysis recovery time (OR=1.27; 95% CI=0.97, 1.64), or quality of life scores. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-dialytic symptoms are correlated and may share a common cause. The presence of certain symptoms affect recovery time and health related quality of life and interventions to alleviate the causes of these intra-dialytic symptoms may improve the lives of patients receiving hemodialysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.053

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.003
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNephrology Dialysis TransplantationSame topicBlood donation and transfusion practicesFrench-language works237,207