Effects of Ustekinumab Induction Therapy on Endoscopic and Histologic Healing in the UNIFI Phase 3 Study in Ulcerative Colitis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Ustekinumab (UST) is an effective therapy for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC), however data regarding histologic healing and the combination of histologic and endoscopic healing are unknown. Methods: We evaluated the effects of UST on histologic and endoscopic activity in the UNIFI Phase 3 induction study of UST in moderate-to-severe UC (n = 961). Two colonic biopsies were collected from the distal colon at Week 8. Subjects not in response to PBO at Week 8 received UST6 mg/kg IV, and those not in response to UST IV received UST90 mg SC; biopsies were obtained from these groups at Week 16. Endoscopic healing (EH) was defined as a Mayo endoscopy score ≤1; histologic healing (HH) comprised the Geboes score-based criteria. Histo-endoscopic mucosal healing (HEMH) was defined as achieving both EH and HH. Results: At Week 8, EH was achieved in 26.6% and 13.8% of subjects treated with UST (combined 130 mg and 6 mg/kg IV doses) and PBO, respectively. HH was achieved in 36.8% and 21.9% of UST and PBO-treated subjects, respectively. HEMH was achieved in 19.3% and 8.9% of UST and PBO-treated subjects, respectively. Similar rates of EH, HH, and HEMH were achieved following induction treatment with UST130 mg or 6 mg/kg IV. Subjects not in response at Week 8 were treated with UST re-evaluated at Week 16; of these, 12.1% and 16.5% of subjects who initially received UST or PBO IV, respectively, achieved HEMH. HH at Week 8 or Week 16 was significantly associated with EH and HEMH (Tab. 1). Table 1: Clinical Outcomes for Subjects with or without Histologic Healing at Week 8 and Week 16 in the UNIFI Phase 3 Induction Study Clinical Outcomes Histologic Healing a Without Histologic Healing a p-value b Week 8 N = 283 N = 533 Mayo Score 3.95 ± 2.57 6.89 ± 2.53 < 0.0001 Partial Mayo Score 2.45 ± 1.84 4.39 ± 2.21 < 0.0001 Stool Frequency 1.09 ± 0.95 1.81 ± 1.03 < 0.0001 Rectal Bleeding 0.30 ± 0.56 0.86 ± 0.89 < 0.0001 Change in Mayo Score -4.53 ± 2.65 -2.15 ± 2.39 < 0.0001 Change in Partial Mayo Score -3.46 ± 2.14 -1.89 ± 2.12 < 0.0001 Change in Stool Frequency -1.08 ± 1.01 -0.63 ± 0.90 < 0.0001 Change in Rectal Bleeding -1.18 ± 0.91 -0.69 ± 0.96 < 0.0001 Week 16 N = 140 N = 209 Mayo Score 3.71 ± 1.94 6.01 ± 2.43 < 0.0001 Partial Mayo Score 1.98 ± 1.27 3.44 ± 2.08 < 0.0001 Stool Frequency 0.96 ± 0.83 1.56 ± 1.02 < 0.0001 Rectal Bleeding 0.13 ± 0.38 0.51 ± 0.69 < 0.0001 Change in Mayo Score -4.95 ± 2.02 -3.08 ± 2.32 < 0.0001 Change in Partial Mayo Score -4.04 ± 1.63 -2.83 ± 2.07 < 0.0001 Change in Stool Frequency -1.31 ± 0.90 -0.92 ± 0.99 0.0003 Change in Rectal Bleeding -1.30 ± 0.89 -0.99 ± 0.85 0.0012 a: Values are reported as mean ± SD. b: P-values based on t-test. Conclusions: Among subjects with moderately-to-severely active UC, those receiving IV UST induction had higher rates of EH, HH, and HEMH than those receiving PBO. Approximately 10% of subjects who did not achieve clinical response 8 weeks after IV UST achieved HEMH following a second dose.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".