The sigma‐1 receptor behaves as an atypical auxiliary subunit to modulate the functional characteristics of Kv1.2 channels expressed in HEK293 cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Expression of Kv1.2 within Kv1.x potassium channel complexes is critical in maintaining appropriate neuronal excitability and determining the threshold for action potential firing. This is attributed to the interaction of Kv1.2 with a hitherto unidentified protein that confers bimodal channel activation gating, allowing neurons to adapt to repetitive trains of stimulation and protecting against hyperexcitability. One potential protein candidate is the sigma-1 receptor (Sig-1R), which regulates other members of the Kv1.x channel family; however, the biophysical nature of the interaction between Sig-1R and Kv1.2 has not been elucidated. We hypothesized that Sig-1R may regulate Kv1.2 and may further act as the unidentified modulator of Kv1.2 activation. In transiently transfected HEK293 cells, we found that ligand activation of the Sig-1R modulates Kv1.2 current amplitude. More importantly, Sig-1R interacts with Kv1.2 in baseline conditions to influence bimodal activation gating. These effects are abolished in the presence of the auxiliary subunit Kvβ2 and when the Sig-1R mutation underlying ALS16 (Sig-1R-E102Q), is expressed. These data suggest that Kvβ2 occludes the interaction of Sig-1R with Kv1.2, and that E102 may be a residue critical for Sig-1R modulation of Kv1.2. The results of this investigation describe an important new role for Sig-1R in the regulation of neuronal excitability and introduce a novel mechanism of pathophysiology in Sig-1R dysfunction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".