Fatigue in children with perinatal stroke: clinical and neurophysiological associations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To characterize fatigue in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke and explore associations with measures of motor performance and corticospinal excitability. METHOD: Forty-five children (16 females, 29 males), aged 6 to 18 years (mean [SD] 12y [4]), with magnetic resonance imaging-confirmed perinatal stroke participated. Associations between fatigue (Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 3.0 cerebral palsy module fatigue subscale), motor performance (Assisting Hand Assessment [AHA], Box and Blocks Test, grip strength), and excitability of corticospinal projections to both hands were examined using ranked tests of correlation, robust regression, and the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Nearly half of the participants (n=21) reported experiencing fatigue in the previous month. Function in the less affected hand (Box and Blocks Test, grip strength) was correlated with fatigue scores. Participants with preserved ipsilateral projections to the more affected hand had less fatigue, and scores correlated with the excitability of these projections. Fatigue scores were not associated with age, sex, or AHA score. INTERPRETATION: Fatigue is common in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke and is associated with motor performance and the presence and excitability of ipsilateral corticospinal projections from the contralesional hemisphere to the more affected hand. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Fatigue is common in children with hemiparesis with perinatal stroke. Fatigue was associated with motor performance and strength in the less affected, but not the more affected, hand. Fatigue was associated with the presence and excitability of ipsilateral corticospinal projections from the contralesional hemisphere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".