MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949260589 · doi:10.1021/jo001124x

Preparation of Polycyclic Systems by Sequential 5-<i>E</i><i>xo</i>-<i>D</i><i>igonal</i> Radical Cyclization, 1,5-Hydrogen Transfer from Silicon, and 5-<i>E</i><i>ndo</i>-<i>T</i><i>rigonal</i> Cyclization

2001· article· he· W2949260589 on OpenAlexaff
Derrick L. J. Clive, Wen Yang, Aaron C. MacDonald, Zhongren Wang, Michel Cantin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Organic Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languagehe
FieldChemistry
TopicRadical Photochemical Reactions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryRadicalStannaneHydrogen atom abstractionRadical cyclizationSiliconAcetyleneSilanesHydrogen atomCleaveCarbon fibersMedicinal chemistryRing (chemistry)StereochemistryPhotochemistrySilaneOrganic chemistryGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radicals of type 1 undergo 5-exo diagonal cyclization, and the resulting vinyl radical abstracts hydrogen from silicon to afford a silicon-centered radical. This radical closes in a 5-endo trigonal manner to generate radicals of type 4, which are reduced (4 --> 5) by stannane, except when the starting acetylene carries a terminal trimethylstannyl group. In this case, radicals 4 expel trimethylstannyl radical to afford vinyl silanes 6. The stereochemical outcome of the radical cascade 1 --> 5 is controlled by the stereochemistry of the oxygen-bearing carbon in 1 (see starred atom). The sequence can be initiated by carbon-, alpha-substituted carbon-, oxyacyl-, and carbamoyl radicals and generates a silicon-containing ring fused onto a carbocycle or heterocycle. Numerous examples are described, as well as a number of transformations of the final cyclization products, especially their response to n-Bu(4)NF and to BF(3).OEt(2), reagents that cleave the newly formed carbon-silicon bond.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Organic ChemistrySame topicRadical Photochemical ReactionsFrench-language works237,207