MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2949355122 · doi:10.14393/ufu.di.2019.369

Aplicações da extensão de Zadeh na dinâmica do HIV com retardo fuzzy sob tratamento antirretroviral

2019· dissertation· pt· W2949355122 on OpenAlexaff
Kassandra Elena Inoñan Alfaro

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languagept
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpam and Phishing Detection
Canadian institutionsBibliographical Society of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFuzzy logicFuzzy setMathematicsContext (archaeology)Applied mathematicsFuzzy numberType-2 fuzzy sets and systemsDefuzzificationExtension (predicate logic)Computer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mathematical models as applied to biological phenomena are usually involved with uncertainties. One way of determining solutions of such mathematical models, including their uncertainties, is by applying the Zadeh's extension principle, which is part of the fuzzy set theory. In this context, the general objective of this research is to present applications of the one-dimensional and two-dimensional Zadeh's extension principle on two mathematical models that simulate the dynamics of HIV antiretroviral treatment, with delay, in seropositive individuals. These applications are presented through fuzzy solutions of the proposed models of HIV dynamics, in which the delay and death rate of the virus are considered as fuzzy numbers. In the first model, the delay and the mortality rate of the virus are considered as fuzzy numbers correlated through an injective and monotonous function which facilitates the attainment of a fuzzy solution of the presented model, since it turns the two-dimensional Zadeh's extension principle into an one-dimensional type. The function that correlates the fuzzy parameters is estimated by two different methods, the first is Mamdani inference method and the second is Takagi-Sugeno inference method, which motivated a comparative study of the solutions in terms of the absolute error. In the other model, a numerical fuzzy solution is obtained through an algorithm developed in this work, considering in the model as triangular fuzzy numbers, the delay and the mortality rate of the virus that do not use a function that correlates them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.762
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpam and Phishing DetectionFrench-language works237,207