MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Impact of zoledronic acid (Z) on pain in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases in a randomised placebo-control trial

2006· article· en· W2949517930 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Abetz, Victoria Barghout, Rob Arbuckle, N. Shirina, Fred Saad

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Canadian institutionsNovartis (Canada)Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBrief Pain InventoryPlaceboProstate cancerBone painZoledronic acidCancerMalignancyInternal medicineSurgeryPhysical therapyChronic painPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

4638 Background: Bone metastases occur in up to 80% of advanced prostate cancer patients and can results in painful Skeletal-Related Events (SREs). Z is the only biphosphonate approved for metastatic prostate cancer that decreases the occurrence of SREs which include pathologic fractures, severe bone pain requiring radiation therapy, spinal cord compression, surgery to bone and hypercalcemia of malignancy which may lead to daily activity limitations. We performed retrospective analyses on data from a placebo-controlled study of Z to investigate which items of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) were most sensitive to changes in patient’s pain due to treatment. Methods: Prostate cancer patients with bone metastases received Zoledronate 4 mg (n = 201) or placebo (n = 201). The BPI was administered at baseline (visit 2), and visits 3 (weeks 3–4), 4 (weeks 6–8), and then every second visit (every 6 weeks) until study end. Changes in BPI individual item scores and the Pain Severity and Pain Interference scale scores were compared between Z and placebo groups. Post-baseline missing data was replaced by Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF). Results: Z was statistically significantly better than placebo for changes in BPI items ‘pain at its worst’, ‘pain at its least’, ‘pain on average’, and the BPI pain severity scale (p < 0.05) at visit 4 (weeks 6–8), and visit 6 (week 12). For ‘pain right now’ there were statistically significant differences at visit 4, but not visit 6. Z was also superior to placebo for ‘pain right now’ and the Pain Severity and Interference scales at visit 12 (week 30–32) (p < 0.05). Finally Z was superior to placebo for ‘interference with general activities’ at visits 12 (week 30–32), 16 (weeks 42–44), and LOCF (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that Z significantly reduces bone pain and general activity limitations in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. Several items in the BPI are more sensitive to Z treatment including ‘pain at its worst’, ‘pain at its least’, ‘pain on average’, and the BPI Pain Severity scale. [Table: see text]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.405 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchFrench-language works237,207